<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Please, Adobe. Give us the Ajax Builder!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.timo-ernst.net/blog/2010/04/29/please-adobe-give-us-the-ajax-builder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.timo-ernst.net/blog/2010/04/29/please-adobe-give-us-the-ajax-builder/</link>
	<description>Developer • YouTuber • Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 18:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Timo		</title>
		<link>https://www.timo-ernst.net/blog/2010/04/29/please-adobe-give-us-the-ajax-builder/#comment-10631</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timo-ernst.net/?p=2202#comment-10631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree,

HTML5 for that web

Flash/Air for the Desktop !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree,</p>
<p>HTML5 for that web</p>
<p>Flash/Air for the Desktop !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: antonio brandao		</title>
		<link>https://www.timo-ernst.net/blog/2010/04/29/please-adobe-give-us-the-ajax-builder/#comment-10629</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antonio brandao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 18:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timo-ernst.net/?p=2202#comment-10629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice post. But even though this idea is great, in many cases the Flash Player should be targeted when maximum performance is desired.

Also, why Ajax on the desktop? There I see no reason at all, and I&#039;d still prefer the Flash Player. The performance is higher and there are more features. So I don&#039;t see justification for Adobe to produce two variants in AIR export. 

For the web, yes!

Still, export to HTML5 makes total sense to me, specially if we could still code in AS (ActionScript Developer here). We could still use the tons of fantastic frameworks and libraries that have been developed in the recent years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. But even though this idea is great, in many cases the Flash Player should be targeted when maximum performance is desired.</p>
<p>Also, why Ajax on the desktop? There I see no reason at all, and I&#8217;d still prefer the Flash Player. The performance is higher and there are more features. So I don&#8217;t see justification for Adobe to produce two variants in AIR export. </p>
<p>For the web, yes!</p>
<p>Still, export to HTML5 makes total sense to me, specially if we could still code in AS (ActionScript Developer here). We could still use the tons of fantastic frameworks and libraries that have been developed in the recent years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
