<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>timo-ernst.net &#187; Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timo-ernst.net/tag/ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timo-ernst.net</link>
	<description>Specialist for Rich Internet Applications and UI-Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Please, Adobe. Give us the Ajax Builder!</title>
		<link>http://www.timo-ernst.net/2010/04/please-adobe-give-us-the-ajax-builder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timo-ernst.net/2010/04/please-adobe-give-us-the-ajax-builder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timo-ernst.net/?p=2202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think, I already mentioned that I really like Adobe&#8217;s products for creating animations and rich internet applications, which are namely Flash Professional, Flash Builder, Catalyst and Illustrator. What I don&#8217;t like is the target platform: The Flash Player. So, after all these debates about Flash, isn&#8217;t it time to simply drop the Flash Player ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timo-ernst.net/2010/04/please-adobe-give-us-the-ajax-builder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One reason for using Flash instead of HTML5</title>
		<link>http://www.timo-ernst.net/2010/02/one-reason-for-using-flash-instead-of-html5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timo-ernst.net/2010/02/one-reason-for-using-flash-instead-of-html5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Internet Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webdevelopment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timo-ernst.net/?p=1785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think, I finally found an answer to the question, why one should use Flash instead of HTML5: Binary sockets Newer Flash Player versions allow developers to open binary socket connections, which is not possible using pure HTML5/JavaScript in the browser (HTML5 only supports websockets, which are different). Thus, for example, it would not be ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timo-ernst.net/2010/02/one-reason-for-using-flash-instead-of-html5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XMLHttpRequest and subdomains</title>
		<link>http://www.timo-ernst.net/2010/01/xmlhttprequest-and-subdomains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timo-ernst.net/2010/01/xmlhttprequest-and-subdomains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerd stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timo-ernst.net/?p=1578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re trying to do a XMLHttpRequest in JavaScript but keep failing, this might help you: First, you need to know two important things: If you try to call a file using the XMLHttpRequest object in JavaScript, which is located on a different server, relative to the running JavaScript source, you&#8217;ll probably get an error. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timo-ernst.net/2010/01/xmlhttprequest-and-subdomains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
